Moscow’s attack and Putin’s next moves: towards the definitive push against NATO?

ER Editor: Kick back for the 40,000 foot view from one of our favourites, Cesare Sacchetti. We’ve inserted tweets showing the videos Sacchetti originally posted but which came with technical glitches.

We also invite readers to check out Pepe Escobar‘s latest —

It’s War: The Real Meat Grinder Starts Now

*********

Moscow’s attack and Putin’s next moves: towards the definitive push against NATO?

CESARE SACCHETTI

When the images of the terrorist attack on the Crocus City Hall in Moscow, a huge concert hall in the Moscow capital which can accommodate 6,000 people, began to circulate, we thought for a moment that we had been put in a time machine and had returned to 2004, at the time of the Beslan school massacre.

At that time, Chechen separatists, financed by the CIA, carried out a barbaric massacre that left 334 people dead, 186 of them children.

It was a different historical period from the current one as Putin’s Russia had only a few years ago begun its journey of rebuilding a nation in ruins and prey to the Ashkenazi oligarchs who, after the collapse of the Berlin Wall, became the true lords of Russia.

Today Russia is a strong and solid nation and can boast one of the best trained and prepared armies in the world, and its influence on the geopolitical level is of absolute importance.

When you look at Russia’s foreign policy, you are looking at a political path that is changing old structures inherited from World War II, ending almost 80 years of unipolar Euro-Atlantic dominance.

When we saw those images, we legitimately wondered what could have happened to allow 4 terrorists to enter the Crocus so easily and perpetrate a massacre that would have left at least 150 victims behind.

In these hours, the hypothesis is circulating that the attack in Moscow was not a real attack, but a sort of staging, or rather a false flag, the expression used in the jargon of the intelligence world to identify a type of action that also involves the execution of false attacks in order to then be able to justify the subsequent reactions of the country that was the victim of that attack, even if simulated.

The first to claim that the attack in Moscow was a false ambush were Putin’s enemies, namely the infamous Ukrainian Nazis who, through their intelligence service, declared that the attack in Moscow was not a real attack.

It was then followed by some representatives of the Anglosphere and Western newspapers who stated that what they saw in Moscow is part of Putin’s repertoire, who will now have the necessary pretext to give rise to the escalation that the Russian president wants in order to definitively end the conflict Ukrainian and give the definitive push to NATO.

One cannot help but notice all the hypocrisy of these people who accuse Russia of staging fake attacks when Western intelligence agencies in recent years have implemented a long series of operations of this type, which have led to the deaths of innocent civilians at the hands of Islamic terrorists, who were often none other than Mossad agents in disguise.

Russia’s other “false flags”

Readers who have been following us for a while know that in the past we were the first to identify false flags in some Russian operations such as the false coup of the Wagner group last June, and subsequently the probable faked death of its historic leader, Prigozhin, very close to Putin already in the early 2000s.

There were already all the elements from the beginning to think that Prigozhin’s coup was just a hoax.

In fact, the Wagner group did not have and does not have the necessary personnel to carry out any march on Moscow and take power on its own, unless it is helped by a significant part of the Russian armed forces.

When his operatives arrived in Rostov-on-Don, signs of the simulation could be seen with the soldiers calmly going to do their shopping and with Prigozhin speaking calmly with the leaders of the Russian armed forces. Summits that he in theory should have overturned.

In the following days, the leader of Wagner was even received by Putin to confirm that there had never been any real animosity between the parties but that the operation in question was implemented to carry out internal clean-ups in the Russian public and military apparatus, and get rid of the fifth columns who were in the pay of the West, of NATO and of the entire network of secret services such as the CIA, MI6 and Mossad.

A Russian general indirectly reached out to this blog and confirmed to us exclusively that what happened was indeed a false flag to carry out internal cleansing operations in a strategy that in Russian is called maskirovska.

The same can be said of the alleged death of Prigozhin, who died on board a plane that took off from Moscow on August 24th when the Russian air transport agency, Rosaviatsiya, did not confirm that the Wagner leader was actually on board.

Only two days earlier, Prigozhin was in Africa announcing the next major maneuvers ahead. Five days after his announcement, the coup took place in Gabon which led to the fall of a puppet government controlled by Paris and which inflicted a very heavy blow on France, thus losing its enormous manganese mines controlled by the Rothschild family through the Eramet company.

The simulation of Prigozhin’s death was in all likelihood a clever misdirection by Moscow to deprive Western adversaries of the possibility of accusing Wagner of “destabilizing” Africa in what is in reality the largest decolonization ever seen in the last 60 years.

In fact, Russia is playing a game of chess that goes beyond Ukraine and extends across the entire planet.

There are two radically opposing ways of seeing international relations at play. On the one hand, there is the decadent and now decayed American imperialism; on the other, there is the vision of multi-polarism, which closes the phase begun in the 20th century that had placed international organizations above nation states, and had transferred powers into the hands of financial and banking centers of power, the true masters of politics throughout the second half of the 20th century and in the first decades of the current century.

Now, as was said previously, some argue that what happened in Moscow is a sort of third chapter of maskirovska.

If you look carefully at one of the initial videos of the attack you can actually see some anomalies such as the fact that the people who receive the machine-gun fire do not seem to lose blood and still remain standing after apparently having received those volleys of shots which, remember, were fired with weapons of war such as AK47s which do considerable damage when hitting bodies especially at close range.

One of the videos of the ambush

In another video, probably made by the terrorists themselves and spread on social networks, we see, however, that there are people lying on the ground bleeding and we even see that one of the attackers tries to behead one of the victims on the ground shouting the classic “Allah akbar”.

The other video of the ambush with the terrorists trying to behead a person

To this we must add the fact that the roof of the Crocus was set on fire and that several pieces of it fell.

If it had been a false flag, as some say, the Russians would have had to make sure that the theater was already empty at the time and would have had to make sure that the fire did not flare up further.

A minimal mistake and loss of life can be incalculable and produce damage that far outweighs the possible benefits of the entire alleged simulation.

This leaves us skeptical that the Moscow terrorist attack for all the variables it entails may have been a false flag operation.

It remains to be understood, however, what did not work possibly in the Russian intelligence machine, which was able to thwart many other attacks and apparently does not seem to have been able to this tour [sic] to anticipate this attack.

A few days ago Putin spoke of traitors in a certain group of Russian intelligence and perhaps this could be the cause of what was seen at the Crocus.

The moves of the Ukrainian Nazis and Putin after the attack

As soon as the attack occurred, what remains of the Ukrainian Nazi regime launched a massive attack on Crimea through a shower of missiles that have almost all been intercepted by the Russian anti-aircraft.

In Kiev they were probably panicked and tried to anticipate or somehow limit Putin’s next move, which will probably be one of the heavy and decisive ones.

And perhaps the next move by the Russian president has already started when a targeted attack on Lvov started in the most western part of Ukraine (ER: near Poland), where Moscow has so far apparently not performed such operations.

Russian missiles apparently entered Poland’s airspace for 40 seconds and this appears to have provoked the Warsaw reaction which caused its jets to intercept the missiles but apparently did not have time to go to the scene that Russian missiles had already hit their target.

Perhaps this encroachment was wanted by the Russians to remind the other party, NATO and its vassals, that Moscow can hit its opponents at any time who are weak and isolated without the protection of the American empire that has stepped aside and has long since abdicated its role.

However, the missiles hit deposits where there was fuel for planes and a training camp for military personnel, perhaps even NATO.

Putin has recently made it clear that soldiers who speak English and French have been intercepted in Ukraine and made it clear that they could be NATO men.

The presence of military advisors of the Atlantic pact was registered in Ukraine as early as 2022 when the Russians gave birth at the battle of the Azovstaal steel mill, under whose basements were found high NATO officers, among whom apparently were also some Italians.

Some Russian sources also recently said that the lieutenant colonel of the bersaglieri, Claudio Castigliawould die in Ukraine during a bombing of Russia.

Despite the presence of NATO consultants or soldiers disguised as mercenaries in Ukraine, we do not believe that there are the conditions for a conflict between NATO and Russia for the simple fact that if NATO had wanted or could have done something it would have done at the beginning of the war and not towards its end, when Zelensky himself is now grappling with a revolt of his generals who would have recently carried out an attack on him.

NATO without the United States is only a paper tiger. There is nothing that this organization can do against Russia, and any serious military expert is aware of this simple evidence.

But now the war in Ukraine has reached an even more important phase than the previous ones.

Russia seems to be very clear what it will have to do to give the Atlantic pact a definitive shoulder, and probably is also waiting for the hostile generals in Zelensky to be able to definitively overthrow the puppet of CIA and Israel, who now lives in permanent fear and moves from bunker to bunker.

These are decisive days and weeks not only for Russia and Ukraine, but for the whole world.

These are probably the last moments of life of the old order of the anglosphere that has imposed itself from 1945 onwards.

However, it is necessary to be vigilant because the other party is in disarray and ready for any tail strokes such as that of the Crocus, which does not serve to achieve any strategically important ends, but only to inflict pain on the other side with massacres of civilians.

The snake’s head must be definitively crushed and Putin seems to have every intention of doing so.

Source

************

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

2 Comments on Moscow’s attack and Putin’s next moves: towards the definitive push against NATO?

  1. Soutien de la Russie à Gaza :
    Vidéo : Le chef du Likoud promettait une vengeance sanglante à la Russie : “la Russie paiera la prix !

    𝖁𝖔𝖎𝖈𝖊𝖘 𝖔𝖋 𝕽𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 🕊
    1:45
    Wolfgang Eggert – Zionists are Behind Moscow Terror Attack

    World War Three is a replay of WW2 with the Zionist West in the role of Nazis and Russia, China, Iran, radical Islam and the BRICS in the role of Communists.

    🏴‍☠False flag terror is the oldest trick in the Mossad tool bag.

    🇩🇪German historian Wolfgang Eggert raises questions about the official Russian narrative.

    🧐15 Suspicious Things about the Moscow Terror Attack

    1. Russia has an alliance with Jerusalem’s arch enemies Syria and Iran; Putins humanitarian support for Gaza and the Hamas after October 7th 2023 nearly crashed the diplomatic relations between the two countries.

    🇮🇱Amir Weitmann, the head of the libertarian caucus in Israel’s ruling Likud party, promised a bloody revenge on the Kremlin – the ‘Russians would pay for supporting the enemies of Israel’ he shouted at a stunned reporter of the Russia tv channel RT.

    by Wolfgang Eggert
    🔗 henrymakow.com

    @VoicesofRevelation1🕊
    1.9K views
    03:20
    https://t.me/voicesofrevelation1/6689

  2. Don’t clik on the image of the gunman, the video from El Güero … it’s a spam link.

    Clik instead within the frame of the X post…and make sure you have a strong stomach.

    I hope Putin rises up one day, and roars…in a hell-fire way…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*