.
ER Editor: Here’s a report on the latest circus in France. We don’t really believe in any of it, preferring to take it as an ongoing show to wake up the masses. With a hunch and strong rumour but no proof.
A reminder that France’s ridiculous Prime Minister, Gabriel Attal, has been pilloried for a combination of his age, his apparent failings in his school and university education, for possibly still being ‘married’ to the current foreign minister, Stephane Sejourne, for being someone who hasn’t lived his life beyond the narrow confines of a very privileged area of Paris. He’s probably attended sexual orgies, too, making him a target of blackmail. (The French view this as ‘private life’, thus being off-limits, not realizing that such indulgence makes the political class a target for the intelligence services and those who control them.)
Attal makes government leadership the biggest joke, and he’s not smart enough to get it.
And speaking of a joke, here’s Attal face to face with a working class kid from an immigrant background in the southern French city of Nice. Journalist Alexis Poulin unpacks it for us in a tweet below (translation provided) – the short video is worth watching. ‘Mechant’ means mean, nasty, bad, evil:
Translation: “He’s mean Macron”: the exchange between a teenager and Gabriel Attal about the President of the Republic
“Il est méchant Macron”: l’échange entre un adolescent et Gabriel Attal à propos du président de la République pic.twitter.com/LstqxnFOos
— BFMTV (@BFMTV) April 22, 2024
TRANSLATION: In two sentences, this young boy did a better job of exposing the Attal/Macron deception than all the journalists on the 24-hour news channels. In the words of a child. “But you’re rich” Attal’s embarrassed reply, “euuuuuuuh yes, but the important thing is to do what you love.”
Ce jeune garçon a fait mieux en deux phrases que tous les journalistes des chaînes d’infos en continue pour dévoiler la supercherie Attal/Macron.
Avec ses mots d’enfant.
“Mais vous êtes riche”
Réponse gênée de Attal, “euuuuuuuh oui mais l’important c’est de faire ce qu’on… pic.twitter.com/anvepDQPHr— Alexis Poulin (@Poulin2012) April 22, 2024
TEXT
This young boy did better in two sentences than all the journalists on the 24-hour news channels to reveal the Attal/Macron deception.
With his childish words. “But you are rich” Embarrassed response from Attal, “euuuuuuuh yes but the important thing is to do what you love.”
“Macron, he’s mean.” Yes Macron is bad, because undoubtedly Macron’s policy of choosing poverty caused a lot of trouble for the parents of this young boy.
Gabriel Attal perfectly embodies the class contempt of a spoiled child, wealthy and pampered by his owning class, in the face of this little boy, who is the perpetual victim of the policies of mistreaters.
A policy which first attacks the dignity of its parents, humiliated, perpetually belittled to end up entangled in everyday life.
Then a policy that will target the children of this trampled class, to make them obedient little soldiers in uniform, rather than emancipating them into free citizens.
But this little boy is free, he holds his emancipation in these two sentences, a clear statement of the class struggle, delivered to him mercilessly by the well-born, the contemptuous, the ambitious.
Yes, this little boy is right a thousand times over, and he destroys the beautiful communication mechanism of Gabriel the Magnificent, with his simple words, with this obvious observation: “you are rich and evil”.
The worst part is that years of social engineering and propaganda to erase the class struggle have meant that the dispossessed, once passed through the machine of stupefying and formatting, vote for the rich and evil. You must always remain that little boy.
Here’s Politico.eu putting lipstick on the pig. Notice their noble choice of inset photo of Attal.
********
French PM Attal unleashes Sarkozy-style politics to tackle far-right surge
Gabriel Attal returns to the themes that led to his meteoric rise in French politics, portraying himself as a man of law and order and a staunch defender of French secularism.
VICTOR GOURY-LAFFONT
PARIS — The French government wants teenagers to stay in the classroom — or go to court.
Prime Minister Gabriel Attal criticized “professional excuse makers” on Thursday and called for a “real boost in authority” as he announced a series of measures aimed at preventing youth delinquency.
In comments marking the 100th day of his tenure, Attal doubled down on his brand of a more direct style of politics in the mold of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, attempting to display strength on themes traditionally associated with the far right. (ER: Sigh, ‘far right’)
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Pam, I don’t have enough time now to write a reply on the several important subjects raised in your message.
(I didn’t either have enough time to write a post about the biased article.)
So I’ll write very short on one subject only :
What “democracy” ?
DSK would have been elected president at the time because we all knew : “anyone but Sarkozy !” (american deep state agent)
Just like we voted Marine le Pen first because : “anyone but Macron”.
DSK (sayan) was not the one chosen by the anglo-US Deep State because he –perhaps– wouldn’t have organized the rigging of the french elections, or/and the nullification of our refusal by referendum of UE dictatorsip and the forced reintegration under NATO command, or/and the murder of Muammar Khadafi.
=>Nothing to do with “democracy”…
The French make a difference between strange sex (private) and criminal sex.
Je ne me suis pas bien exprimée. C’est assez propre à la France (pas aux pays anglo-saxons) de ne pas toucher à la vie privée des élites. Et les gens ordinaires le croient. Un journaliste britannique l’a bien résumé un jour : ces lois sont faites pour les élites, qui veulent cacher ce qu’elles font en privé. Cette loi a empêché la publication en France d’un article du Daily Mail révélant ce que faisait Sarkozy, par exemple. Les élites savent parfaitement que ce qu’elles font en privé ne sera jamais accepté par les gens ordinaires. Ils font donc en sorte que les gens ordinaires soutiennent l’idée que la vie privée est privée, alors que les gens ordinaires comme nous vivent de manière plutôt ordinaire et propre. Les Français dont nous sommes proches répètent cette idée comme un mantra sur la vie privée, alors que leur esprit semble déconnecté de ce que peut être la réalité de cette idée. La plupart des gens (partout) ne semblent pas comprendre que nos élites sont sous le contrôle d’une classe cachée. L’indulgence sexuelle et la bizarrerie sont le livre de recettes de la classe pour le chantage. Ainsi, lorsque nous entendons parler de DSK (il y a longtemps maintenant) et de ses orgies de merde, les gens se détournent instinctivement au lieu de se demander “qu’est-ce que cela signifie pour la démocratie ? Et “est-ce que j’approuve cela ?
And thanks for the link to a great article on Miterrand!
“The French view this as ‘private life’, thus being off-limits, not realizing that such indulgence makes the political class a target for the intelligence services and those who control them.”
WRONG. The French realize the scope of malfeasance of the gang that is rotten to the core.
More information in the link provided in this post :
https://olivierdemeulenaere.wordpress.com/2024/04/21/bienvenue-en-frussie-le-pays-du-conservatisme-dynamique/#comment-248586